stratt://finance/
20 units across 4 types: chain, role, rule, task
| Slug | Type | Status | Fingerprint | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| closing-checklist | chain | draft | ●Verified | Track what's outstanding, who owns it, and what's actually blocking close. |
| counterparty-profile | chain | draft | ●Verified | Build the picture of who you're dealing with — history, exposure, and track record. |
| due-diligence | chain | draft | ●Verified | Triage the data room, normalise the statements, and surface the red flags worth escalating. |
| model-build | chain | draft | ●Verified | Scaffold a DCF or LBO with assumptions you can defend and inputs you can change quickly. |
| pitch-stress-test | chain | draft | ●Verified | Pressure the assumptions, sanity-check the numbers, and catch the things reviewers will. |
| risk-score | chain | draft | ●Verified | A conservative risk read on the deal — what stops it, what slows it, what you can live with. |
| finance-analyst | role | draft | ●Verified | Conservative, methodical reader of financial documents who extracts, organises, and models what the numbers say — without ever crossing into giving investment advice or guaranteeing outcomes. |
| conservative-read | rule | draft | ●Verified | Hard boundary ensuring all finance-domain outputs stay on the right side of the analysis-vs-advice line. Extraction, normalisation, modelling, and flagging are in scope; investment recommendations, return predictions, and deal verdicts are not. |
| closing-checklist-extract | task | draft | ●Verified | Read the deal materials and produce a structured list of all items required to close, each with owner and status. |
| closing-checklist-track | task | draft | ●Verified | Review the extracted closing items and identify what is actually blocking close, who needs to act, and what the critical path looks like — without advising on deal terms. |
| counterparty-profile-build | task | draft | ●Verified | Convert extracted counterparty data into a concise, structured profile that a deal team can use as a reference — without characterising the counterparty as trustworthy or untrustworthy. |
| counterparty-profile-gather | task | draft | ●Verified | Read the available materials on a counterparty and extract structured data on their history, financial position, and prior transaction track record. |
| due-diligence-surface-red-flags | task | draft | ●Verified | Review the normalised financial statements and data room inventory for items that warrant escalation — without predicting outcomes or advising on the deal. |
| due-diligence-triage-data-room | task | draft | ●Verified | Read the data room materials, identify what is present and what is missing, and normalise the financial statements into a consistent format for review. |
| model-build-audit-assumptions | task | draft | ●Verified | Review the scaffolded model's assumptions against available data and industry context, flagging any that are aggressive, unsupported, or unusually sensitive. |
| model-build-scaffold | task | draft | ●Verified | Lay out the structure, key inputs, and calculation logic for a DCF or LBO model, with clearly labelled assumptions and fast-change input cells. |
| pitch-stress-test-extract | task | draft | ●Verified | Read the pitch deck and produce a structured table of its key claims, financial projections, and stated assumptions — in plain English. |
| pitch-stress-test-pressure | task | draft | ●Verified | Review the extracted claims and projections, identify where the numbers are most vulnerable, and surface the questions a diligent reviewer will ask. |
| risk-score-identify | task | draft | ●Verified | Read the deal materials and identify the risk factors across execution, financial, market, and counterparty dimensions — without recommending whether to proceed. |
| risk-score-summarise | task | draft | ●Verified | Convert the risk factor table into a clear, structured risk summary that a deal team can use to brief stakeholders — without verdict or advice. |